The Traffic Accident Reconstruction Origin -ARnews-

Peer Review

Ed Phillips (ephillpw@co.san-diego.ca.us)
Tue, 18 Nov 1997 14:16:45 -0500 (EST)

I appreciate this site and the posts to be a form of peer review. If such an idea makes a person uncomfortable, then you may consider reading but not posting. I have seen we have a wide assortment of education and experience dialed in here. Though my posts are never intended to be taken as personal (I can do that directly) I can not control how they are received. Anyone who posts is subject to a peer review, and those peer review's are subject to the same scrutiny. The intent, I believe, is to consolidate our understanding. I suspect you will benefit more if you subject your comments to electronic autopsy, but use the same to increase your understanding. Many of us have worked with investigators that spend more time driving to the scenes than trying to figure out how they happened. Accept the comments as constructive. I, too, have been taken to task, and not one of us is beyond making errors of logic or math-a-magic. If you feel you are, you've already made your first mistak
e.
Ed Phillips
ephillpw@co.san-diego.ca.us

NOTE: You are reading in an archived session of ARnews. It is possible that this topic is still being discussed. To see if this topic is still active, or of there were any more recent posts on this topic, check later archives of ARnews.

If there is no current post, and you would like to add to this topic, link to the Current ARnews Discussion and begin a new thread. Be sure that if you are starting a new post that the thread title does not contain the abbreviation RE: Placing RE: at the beginning of a new post will confuse Hypermail and prevent others from answering your post in the future.

For example, to continue this discussion look for a thread titled

Peer Review

If this thread does not exist in the current archive, you can begin another one by using that title.