The Traffic Accident Reconstruction Origin -ARnews-

Re: Peer Review

Chris Borelli (sdl@ids.net)
Wed, 19 Nov 1997 07:58:40 -0500 (EST)

I absolutely agree with Ed. I would hope that the pupose of this site
was to provide a forum for reconstructionists with experience in certain
areas to aid others. Two heads are always better than one. The individuals
that do not have a co-worker to bounce ideas off of now have somewhere to
go for a second opinion.

There is nothing wrong with listing your opinion, listening to other opinions,
and combining the group to arrive at a final opinion. However, the ones that
feel that they are always correct and will not listen to other opinions are
missing out on a wealth of information and experience and the purpose of this
site. As they said in school "the only bad question is the question that is
not asked".

Chris Borelli
Chris Borelli
sdl@ids.net

NOTE: You are reading in an archived session of ARnews. It is possible that this topic is still being discussed. To see if this topic is still active, or of there were any more recent posts on this topic, check later archives of ARnews.

If there is no current post, and you would like to add to this topic, link to the Current ARnews Discussion and begin a new thread. Be sure that if you are starting a new post that the thread title does not contain the abbreviation RE: Placing RE: at the beginning of a new post will confuse Hypermail and prevent others from answering your post in the future.

For example, to continue this discussion look for a thread titled

Peer Review

If this thread does not exist in the current archive, you can begin another one by using that title.