The Traffic Accident Reconstruction Origin -ARnews-
|
|
Re: ARnews Frequently Asked Questions
Rod Macdonald (frmrmtr@aol.com)
Tue, 1 Jun 1999 09:36:58 -0400 (EDT)
The simple answer would be Yes.
You may get away with it if there was no change in the post-impact direction of travel from separation to point of rest, but there are a number of scenarios where that change is possible, in fact it's probably more likely there was a change than not.
Even so, if you didn't analyze the post-impact movement to determine that, you haven't done things properly.
Rod Macdonald
frmrmtr@aol.com
NOTE: You are reading in an archived session of ARnews.
It is
possible that this topic is still being discussed. To see if this topic is still active, or of there were
any more recent posts on this topic, check later archives of ARnews.
If there is no current post, and you would
like to add to this topic, link to the Current
ARnews Discussion and
begin a new thread. Be sure that if you are starting a new post that the thread title does not contain
the abbreviation RE: Placing RE: at the beginning of a new post will confuse Hypermail and prevent others
from answering your post in the future.
For example, to continue this discussion look for a thread titled
ARnews Frequently Asked Questions
If this thread does
not exist in the current archive, you can begin another one by using that title.